|

A
Multi-University Research Initiative
Funded by The Army Research Office
2005 ACCLIMATE Review Meeting
PARTNERS
-
-
- Carnegie Mellon University
MISSION STATEMENT
We propose the design
and evaluation of the adaptive hierarchical control of mixed autonomous
and human operated semi-autonomous teams that deliver high levels of
mission reliability despite uncertainty arising from rapidly evolving
environments and malicious interference from an intelligent adversary.
The design of architectures combining both hierarchical and
heterarchical elements, the analytical foundations of interacting
hybrid systems, the design of controllers for such systems that are
robust against uncertainty, the management of rich sensory information
from networked sensors among distributed and mobile teams; and the
incorporation of human intervention in a mixed-initiative system are
all key areas of our work. Additionally, the novelty of our approach is
to explicitly take into account the need to adaptively replan missions
to take into account environmental uncertainties and the deliberate
malicious actions of a determined adversary. Our approach builds on the
following research thrusts:
Thrust I:
Architecture Design and Analysis for Dynamic, Adaptive Planning.
The architectures
that we design will organically incorporate human intervention at all
levels of planning and execution. Architectural design begins with an
overall hierarchy featuring flexible team formation, task
specification, pre-mission evaluation, and changes in goals, team
composition, and communications during mission execution. In the rapid
adaptive, dynamic replanning, it is an absolute necessity to have
modules which can be composed interoperably on the fly when warranted
by the actions of the adversary. A main drawback of traditional
approaches of hybrid systems has been their extreme
conservativeness of compositionality when designing intrinsically
complex architectures.
We will address these
issues through work on:
- Abstractions for perception and
action, and
- Assume-guarantee reasoning and
interface theory for compositionality.
Thrust II:
Integration of Rich Multi-sensor Information into Virtual Environments
for Incorporating Human Intervention in Mission Planning and Execution.
A key difficulty in
the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), unmanned ground vehicles
(UGVs) and unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) is the difficulty in
acquiring the rich sensory data gathered by the vehicles contributing
to sensory-overload where teams of up to four warfighters are required
to control a single robotic asset (either a UAV or a flight control
system). We propose to handle the fusion of rich multi-sensor
information over an unreliable network by developing new classes of
algorithms combining recent work in omni directional vision, the
extraction of graphical models from video sequences, and the joint
rendering of simulated (synthetic) environments with multi-sensor
(real) data.
The research
directions are:
- Adaptive hierarchical networks
for acquiring and providing information,
- Extraction of 3D models from
distributed video and other sensors networks, and
- Environments for human
intervention and decision making.
Thrust III:
Handling Uncertainty and Adversarial Intent in Adaptive Planning.
Two types of
uncertainty pervade mission planning and execution:
- Probabilistic uncertainty
having to do with environmental unknowns, such as weather, terrain data
uncertainty, the probabilistic nature of failures of hardware or
software, information attack,
- Adversarial uncertainty having
to do with systematic attempts by an intelligent adversary (red-force)
to defeat the mission.
A key mathematical
framework for the modeling of adversarial actions comes from the theory
of games, and partially observable Markov decision processes and games.
We will develop methods for; learning of adversarial strategies.
We will develop teaming and game strategies to allow for defeating a dynamic
adversary, that is one who changes his strategy, cost function,
information atterns during the course of an engagement.
Finally the strategy
for the integration of the research of the three University teams is
through a set of two or more scenario-based challenge problems
involving intelligent adversaries on the extensive testbeds at the
three partner institutions. The scenarios are responsive to battlefield
scenarios as well as other national security needs such as hostage
rescue, tracking of unfriendly forces, and homeland security needs.
Contact the
Webmaster (graspdoc@grasp.cis.upenn.edu)
Last Updated: Sep 26th, 2005
|